USPTO serial 74552284
RINDA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RINDA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
13400 Butterworth P.W., MY
Other trademarks owned by Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
13400 Butterworth P.W., MY
Other trademarks owned by Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANET DORE
JANET DORE MORGAN & FINNEGAN345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fruit flavored sweet jellies; shelled, roasted and processed nuts; baked, dried and processed beans | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks owned by Rinda Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named RINDA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |