USPTO serial 74552579
Serial No. 74552579
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 74552579?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lincolnwood, IL
Lincolnwood, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Beise
ROBERT S BEISE MICHAEL, BEST & FRIEDRICH100 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | compact disc players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 3, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |