USPTO serial 74553323
ORGANIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ORGANIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert L. Haines
ROBERT L HAINES LAW OFFICE SHERMAN & SHALLOWAY413 N WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | textiles made of cotton for use in the manufacturing of clothing | ABANDONED | Mar 2, 1990 |
| 025 | men's, women's and children's clothing all made of cotton, namely shirts, pants, dresses, skirts, shorts, sweaters, vests, jackets, coats, cover-ups, coveralls, jumpsuits, underwear, socks, scarves, sleepwear, bathrobes, playsuits, rompers, jumpers, loungewear, headwear, sweatpants, sweatshirts, sweatshorts, sweatsuits, jogging suits, warm-up suits, T-shirts, tank tops and tunics | ABANDONED | Mar 2, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 10, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |