Drawing for AMBROSIA

USPTO serial 74554158

AMBROSIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AMBROSIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RONALD L PANITCH

JAY K. MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, L.L.C.Two Liberty Place, 50 South 16th Street22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031dog and cat foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 28, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 18, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 2, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 28, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 13, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 31, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance