USPTO serial 74554181
BEACH NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, HANNAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEACH NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard W. Sherman
LEONARD W SHERMAN SHERMAN AND SHALLOWAY413 N WASHINGTON STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and toiletries, namely hair shampoos, lotions and conditioners, skin lotions, oils and creams, make-up, perfumes and colognes | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | nutritional supplements, namely food supplements and vitamin, mineral and herbal supplements | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | sunglasses | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | jewelry and watches | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | towels and beach towels | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | clothing and apparel, namely hats, caps, shirts, pants, shorts, T-shirts, tank tops, swimwear and beach wear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Karen
- Other trademarks owned by Davis, Karen
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BEACH NATURALS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 23, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |