Drawing for BRAVO

USPTO serial 74554873

BRAVO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRAVO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn K. Beaton

GLEN K BEATON BEATON & SWANSON4582 S ULSTER STR PKWYSTE 403DENVER, CO 80237

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for billing customers of telecommunications services, such as telephone, cable television, and cellular telephoneABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 1995ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 22, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 22, 1995OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 21, 1995OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 20, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 28, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 19, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 10, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance