USPTO serial 74555453
BODY COMPLIMENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BODY COMPLIMENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Etobicoke Ontario M9B 6B8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY D KRUGMAN
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK AND SEAS2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath additives, namely, foam bath and bubble bath; personal deodorants and antiperspirants; emery boards, toothpaste and mouthwash, perfumes | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | manicure implements, namely, nail clippers, nail buffers, cuticle scissors, scissors, nail files, cushioned surfacing board, cuticle nippers, cuticle knife, nail white pencil and manicure sticks; cosmetic accessories, namely, barber scissors, eyelash curlers, blackhead removers, and eyebrow tweezers | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | cosmetic pencil sharpeners | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | natural sea sponges; pumice sponges and pumice stones, bath brushes, loofah bath mitts, body pads and natural loofah, and sisal mitts | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OSHAWA GROUP LIMITED, THE
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named BODY COMPLIMENTS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |