USPTO serial 74556228
BEAR U.S.A., INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEAR U.S.A., INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Harrington Park, NJ
Harrington Park, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Chung
DANIEL CHUNG FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely COLD WEATHER HATS, HEADBANDS, AND FOOTWEAR EXCLUDING GOLF SHOES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 1995 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |