USPTO serial 74556730
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FUTURE PUBLISHING LTD. (PARTIAL ASSIGNEE)
BATH, GB
Other trademarks owned by FUTURE PUBLISHING LTD. (PARTIAL ASSIGNEE)
PASADENA, CA
Edge Interactive Media, Inc., The
Pasadena, CA
BATH BA1 2BW, GB
Edge Interactive Media, Inc., The
Pasadena, CA
Edge Interactive Media, Inc., The
Pasadena, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Langdell
TIM LANGDELL EDGE GAMES INC530 SOUTH LAKE AVENUE#171PASADENA, CA 91101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed matter and publications, namely, magazines, newspapers, journals, and columns and sections within such magazines, newspapers, and journals, and pamphlets and booklets, all in the fields of business, entertainment, and education, relating to toys, games, board games, television, interactive music, and video; stationery; posters; exterior packaging for software, namely, cardboard cartons; printed paperboard inserts for plastic packaging of software; paper bags; plastic bubble packs for packaging; envelopes; and paper pouches for packaging | SECTION 37 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2013 | C37. | CANCELLED SECTION 37-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 9, 2013 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jun 24, 2010 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2009 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |