Drawing for SMARTWASHER

USPTO serial 74556736

SMARTWASHER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMARTWASHER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis T. Isaf

LOUIS T ISAFPOST OFFICE BOX 720601ATLANTA, GA 30358-2601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007filters for use in a parts washer machine; parts washer machine, comprised of wash basin, fluid reservoir, fluid cycling pump and piping, and filter sold as a unitABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 11, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 13, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 5, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 3, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 20, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 30, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance