USPTO serial 74557257
MRS. LOEWNFATT'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MRS. LOEWNFATT'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry I. Hollander
BARRY I HOLLANDER HOLLANDER LAW FIRM PLC10300 EATON PL STE 305FAIRFAX, VA 22030-2239UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant and grocery retail store services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |