Drawing for CLEANSORB

USPTO serial 74558110

CLEANSORB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEANSORB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bujold

MICHAEL J BUJOLD DAVIS, BUJOLD & STRECK, PAFOURTH FL500 COMMERCIAL STMANCHESTER, NH 03101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical products used in industry, namely industrial sorbants for removing toxic gases from a fluid streamABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 18, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 8, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance