USPTO serial 74559591
INDRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUTHEY, LYNN A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fritz L. Schweitzer
FRITZ L SCHWEITZER SCHWEITZER & CORNMAN230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, essential oils, cosmetic preparations, lotions for the hair and the face, shaving lotions dentifrices, mouthwashes, bath preparations, suntan preparations, skin cremes, soaps, products for the protection and maintenance of skin, cosmetic starches and starch derivatives; medicaments; pharmaceutical, veterinary, and hygiene products, products for the destruction of harmful animals and plants, disinfectants, starches and starch derivatives for hygienic products, and products for the treatment of skin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |