Drawing for DISCOVERY PRODUCTS

USPTO serial 74560692

DISCOVERY PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WOLFSON, FRANCES
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Margaret M. Duncan

MARGARET M DUNCAN MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009litigation support software for use in the legal field for indexing, searching and retrieving text from legal or other documents for use in litigation proceedingsABANDONEDFeb 1, 1993
016user manuals thereforABANDONEDFeb 1, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 1998ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 26, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 11, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance