USPTO serial 74561963
EVOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
V.T. Giordano
V T GIORDANO VON MALTITZ, DERENBERG, KUNIN, ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCEDES-BENZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named EVOLUTION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |