Drawing for ULTRA CONVENIENCE CENTER

USPTO serial 74562810

ULTRA CONVENIENCE CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2956368Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 31, 2005
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ULTRA CONVENIENCE CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. McKenna

Richard J. McKenna Foley & Lardner LLP777 E. Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail convenience store servicesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 5, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
May 31, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Sep 5, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jun 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 31, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Oct 19, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Sep 24, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 28, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jan 9, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 8, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 18, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 11, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance