USPTO serial 74563432
LIPOTECA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 608
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIPOTECA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1P1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dermatological cream | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1998 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |