USPTO serial 74563642
WORKMASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUSSMAN, RONALD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKMASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
23542 Luebeck, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan H. Bernstein
ALAN H BERNSTEIN CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, ET AL12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | garments and protective suits made from fabric cloth designed for protection against chemical substances and noxious gases or other pollutants | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | fabric cloth for use in the further manufacture of protective clothing and covers for the protection of goods and humans against chemical substances and noxious gases or other pollutants | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |