Drawing for CHICAGO METALLIC

USPTO serial 74564521

CHICAGO METALLIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1966265Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 9, 1996
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with CHICAGO METALLIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Brett Heavner

B. Brett Heavner Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal ceiling systems, namely suspended ceilings, open cell ceilings, parallel beam ceilings, linear baffle ceilings, all principally comprised of metal runners, suspension wires, cross-tees, and metal perimeter treatments; drywall ceiling systems for attaching drywall panels comprised principally of metal runners, metal cross-tees, metal furring tees, and metal drywall channels; metal ceiling components, namely panels, beams, cross-tees, runners, and metal ceiling accessories, namely wall moldings, wall angles, drywall tracks, and corner capsACTIVEJan 1, 1951

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2026NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Jun 10, 2026RNL3REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jun 10, 202689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jun 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 7, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Apr 9, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Mar 20, 2024ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jul 12, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 15, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED
Apr 15, 2016RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 15, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 15, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 8, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 28, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 25, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Jan 28, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 26, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 11, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 15, 2006RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Jul 15, 200689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Jul 7, 2006PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL
Apr 10, 2006E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED
Aug 1, 2001C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
May 23, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED
Apr 9, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 16, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 15, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 19, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 12, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 8, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 21, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance