USPTO serial 74566057
COOL SPRING WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2601301Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOL SPRING WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Calgary, Alberta, CA
COOL SPRING WATER COMPANY LIMTED
Calgary, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY D KRUGMAN
GARY D KRUGMAN SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | flavoured juices, carbonated soft drinks, non-carbonated soft drinks, distilled water for drinking, filtered water for drinking, and spring water for drinking | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 8, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MR. SOFTWATER LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MR. SOFTWATER LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MR. SOFTWATER LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by COOL SPRING WATER COMPANY LIMTED
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named COOL SPRING WATER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |