USPTO serial 74567258
DENT ELIMINATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1946143Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 1996
- Examiner
- BAXLEY,ANDREW P
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DENT ELIMINATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KIRK M. HARTUNG
KIRK M HARTUNG MCKEE VOORHEES & SEASE PLC801 GRAND AVE STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | automobile and truck body repair, namely removing dents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 27, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |