USPTO serial 74567447
WILBUR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WILBUR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL J. HUGHES
MICHAEL J HUGHES THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE OFMICHAEL J HUGHES1171 HOMESTEAD RD STE 295SANTA CLARA, CA 95050Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dried fruits | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |