USPTO serial 74569421
SOFTOP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASIELLO, ANTHO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOFTOP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
23501 UUSIKAUPUNKI, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY MERCHANT, GOULD, SMITH, EDELL, ET AL3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | land vehicle parts, namely, the frame and mechanical linkages for controlling the movement of the retractable roof of an automobile during opening and closing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |