USPTO serial 74570413
CAPITAL ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARMINE, F. D.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAPITAL ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
GLEN ALLEN, VA
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
GLEN ALLEN, VA
Richmond, VA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial services, namely commercial banking; processing, funding, underwriting and administering annuities; financial card and debit card services, namely processing, underwriting, issuing, servicing and administering chip cards, debit cards, corporate cards, electronic funds transfer provided through automated teller machines; investment consultation, namely financial and investment planning and consulting; consumer and commercial leasing financing; real estate financing, namely commercial equity financing | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Signet Banking Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CAPITAL ONE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |