Drawing for HEALTHY CHOICE

USPTO serial 74572222

HEALTHY CHOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEALTHY CHOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick C. Stephenson

PATRICK C STEPHENSONMCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZOMAHA, NE 68102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005vitaminsACTIVE—
029processed, frozen, canned and dried fruit; processed, frozen, canned and dried vegetablesACTIVE—
030breadsticks, cookies, crackers and iced tea; salad dressingACTIVE—
032bottled drinking water, fruit flavored soft drinks and non-carbonated soft drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 9, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 27, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 24, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 28, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 6, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 6, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 8, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 12, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance