USPTO serial 74573153
ENERGY SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENERGY SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Marsh
ROBERT E MARSH BLACKWELL SANDERS MATHENY WEARY LOMBARDITWO PERSHING SQ STE 11002300 MAIN ST P O BOX 419777KANSAS CITY, MO 64141-6777Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UtiliCorp Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by UtiliCorp Holdings Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENERGY SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 27, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |