USPTO serial 74574985
BLUE MOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - MAIL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE MOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sabrina C. Stavish
SABRINA C STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS & MCINTOSH1700 LINCOLN STSTE 3500DENVER, CO 80203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |