USPTO serial 74576390
SNAPMOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACK, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SNAPMOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal electrical raceway systems comprising base raceways, divider clips, divider strips, couplings, covers, end fittings, wire clips, elbow and tee fittings, corner clips, device places, wall box feeds, telephone covers, and telephone and receptacle plates for use in conjunction with the installation of electrical wiring in commercial and residential structures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |