USPTO serial 74576731
WATER WALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIRST, VIVIAN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WATER WALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ancaster, Ontario L9K 1H8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Delbridge, Esq.
ROBERT F DELBRIDGE GOWLING LAFLEUR HENDERSON LLPSTE 560 120 KING ST WHAMILTON, ON L8P 4V2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | flexible bags which in use are filled with water to form barriers against flood water or hazardous liquids | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |