USPTO serial 74576829
T. HAWK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with T. HAWK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chuo-ku, Osaka 540, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER M. EICHLER
PETER M EICHLER JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO2121 AVE OF THE STARS, 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper and paper articles, namely stationery and envelopes; printed matter, namely books and cards; general circulation newspapers and periodicals, namely toy-and game-related magazines and fliers; books relating to toys and/or games; mounted or unmounted photographs and stationery | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |