USPTO serial 74576968
SIDEWINDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 1999
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SIDEWINDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SANTA CLARA, CA
Roseville, MN
St. Paul, MN
AUSTIN, TX
Roseville, MN
SANTA CLARA, CA
ST. PAUL, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher M. Kindel
Christopher M. Kindel Pirkey Barber PLLC600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer security products, namely, hardware and software for secure access to external networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 27, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCAFEE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by FORCEPOINT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SECURE COMPUTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MCAFEE, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SECURE COMPUTING, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SIDEWINDER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 6, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 16, 2017 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 2, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 27, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 15, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |