USPTO serial 74578769
SNAP CAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNAP CAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken C. Decker
KEN C DECKER BAKER & DANIELS205 W JEFFERSON BLVD STE 250SOUTH BEND, IN 46601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | removable truck bed shell formed of separable panelled sections and having a rigid form when fully assembled | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 9, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |