USPTO serial 74580166
GEL-TAPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORE, MICHAEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GEL-TAPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVDSTE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | flexible pressure sensitive adhesive base carrier tape for automatic handling of raw wafer dies and other surface-mount components | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 13, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 9, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |