USPTO serial 74580404
BIOVEGETAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 1996
- Examiner
- BUTLER, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIOVEGETAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
Ville St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
Ville St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
Ville St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SIMOR L. MOSKOWITZ
SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetic preparations, namely, cleansing milk; day and night creams; hydration, equilibrium, vitality, and phyto aromatic creams; moisturizing cream, firming cream, herbal and plant extract creams; herbal and plant extract oils; herbal and plant extract facial cosmetic paste; herbal and plant extract rejuvenating and moisturizing gels; eye cleansing emulsion; eye contour creams and gels; eyelid creams and gels; non-alcoholic face lotion; phyto aromatic beauty mask; and body creams and lotions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
- Other trademarks owned by LABORATOIRES DERMO COSMETIK INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BIOVEGETAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |