USPTO serial 74581962
EQUINOX FITNESS CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EQUINOX FITNESS CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Begler
JAY H BEGLER LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER, PC41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | furniture, picture frames, mirrors, book cases, chests, figures, figurines, jewelry cases not of precious metals, plastic key chain tags, money clips, novelty buttons, statues, gift decorations made of plastic | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | cosmetic brushes, eyebrow brushes, hair brushes, nail brushes, hair combs, shaving brush stands, shaving brushes, shaving dishes, shaving pots, soap containers, containers for food or beverages coasters, beverage stirrers, cork holders, cork screws, cups, beverage glassware, mugs, figurines; brushes for pets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 2, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1996 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Feb 27, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |