Drawing for AORAKI

USPTO serial 74582518

AORAKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AORAKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Dennison

DONALD L DENNISON612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009multimedia software recorded on CD-ROM featuring children's educational and entertainment materials, excluding games, and geographical educational materialsACTIVE—
016documentation manuals pertaining to computer hardware and software for use with object oriented language, a relational database and applications development program; computer programs recorded on cards and paper for object oriented language, a relational database and applications development program; and computer printer paperACTIVE—
038communication services, namely electronic transmission of data and messages; telecommunications services via computer network; and the electronic storage of messages and data for othersACTIVE—
042computer programming services for others; rental of computer equipment; computer consultation; and computer software design for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 14, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 14, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 8, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 14, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 1997PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 13, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 1997IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jul 16, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 22, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 31, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 22, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 21, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 5, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 23, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 17, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance