USPTO serial 74582873
DUKE KAHANAMOKU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUKE KAHANAMOKU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID B NEWMAN JR
DAVID B NEWMAN JR DAVID NEWMAN & ASSOCIATES PCP O BOX 2728LA PLATA, MD 20646-2728UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | surfing, sailing, beach and water sports accessories, namely, sails, tents, tarpaulins, unfitted swimming pool covers, and protective liners of flexible vinyl for swimming pools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Outrigger Duke Kahanamoku Foundation
- Other trademarks owned by Outrigger Duke Kahanamoku Foundation
- Other trademarks in Class 022
- Similar marks named DUKE KAHANAMOKU
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 17, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |