Drawing for HOUSEFILE MAXIMIZER

USPTO serial 74583890

HOUSEFILE MAXIMIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOUSEFILE MAXIMIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lesley Witt Craig

LESLEY WITT CRAIG SHERIDAN ROSS & MCINTOSH1700 LINCOLN STSTE 3500DENVER, CO 80203

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035marketing research servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 1997ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 20, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 28, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance