Drawing for THE CERPLEX GROUP

USPTO serial 74584737

THE CERPLEX GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE CERPLEX GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHARON E. MEIERAN

SHARON E MEIERAN BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISONTWO EMBARCADERO PL2200 GENG RDPALO ALTO, CA 94303

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042outsourcing services for others in the fields of aerospace electronics, automotive electronics and instrumentation, computer hardware, medical instrumentation and telecommunications hardware, namely, providing depot repair services for others; providing custom manufacturing services for others, namely, product assembly and testing, product design and prototype assembly and design; inventory management for others; warehouse and distribution management for others, namely, providing management and inventory control for others in security controlled warehousing facilities; providing extended warranty programs for others, ensuring the ongoing maintenance and serviceability of others' products; and refurbishing out-of-date products for othersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 1, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 18, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 8, 1997EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 19, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 18, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 18, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 15, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance