USPTO serial 74584859
ANTAEUS GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ODONOVICH, ANITA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ANTAEUS GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred W. Hathaway
FRED W HATHAWAY VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE N WSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | plastic recycling services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 25, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |