USPTO serial 74585232
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
BRYAN K WHEELOCK ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE, SCHLAFLY & DAVISONE METROPOLITAN SQSTE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | provision of financial information by electronic means | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 26, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |