Drawing for PLUG AND PRINT

USPTO serial 74585352

PLUG AND PRINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLUG AND PRINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jay H. Begler

JAY H BEGLER LIDDY, SULLIVAN, GALWAY & BEGLER41 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009protocol converters, printer controllers, computer interface boards, printed circuit boards, printer emulation boards, printer servers and page printers, all for use in connection with computers and printersABANDONEDJan 1, 1994
042computer hardware and software systems design; customized design of computer systems; computer programming services; computer consulting services regarding program design for microprocessors; updating technical data computer programs for text and data processingABANDONEDJan 1, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 1996ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 12, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance