USPTO serial 74585604
SPRING RAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPRING RAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bradford BD4 6S, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | bath fittings, namely sinks, showers, water taps, faucets, soap trays, towel bars, shower heads, shower diverters, drains, drain plugs; bath plumbing fixtures, bath, water closets, toilets, toilet seats, toilet bowls, bidets, wash basins, shower cubicles and stalls, shower trays, cisterns, basins, cookers and stoves for natural gas synthetic gas and electricity, ovens, refrigerators, freezers, dryers, gas and electrical heating elements and burners; parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | custom fitted kitchen structures, namely custom fitted kitchen cupboards, built-in work top surfaces, built-in breakfast bars; sofas, settees, coffee tables, upholstered furniture, bookcases, mirrors, curtain rails; and parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |