Drawing for NATURE'S GIFTS

USPTO serial 74587058

NATURE'S GIFTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURE'S GIFTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK J. COYNE

PATRICK J COYNE3050 K ST N WSTE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20007

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003scented skin and body soaps, formed in miniature novelty shapes; non-medicated cosmetic lip gloss; non-medicated bath additives and treatments, namely, scented spa and bath crystals, bath and body oils, hand and body lotion, perfumery, namely, essential oils, bubble bath; body massage balms; fragrant gifts, namely, sachets, potpourri; and fragrant wooden items, namely, wooden balls, hearts and bear shaped figures, all in miniature containersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 1997ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 24, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 4, 1996REINREINSTATED—
Nov 27, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 8, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance