Drawing for ESSENTIAL

USPTO serial 74587567

ESSENTIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2120173Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 1997
Examiner
LEETZOW, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENTIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Allison Strickland

CSC HOLDINGS INC1111 STEWART AVEBETHPAGE, NY 11714-3533UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications, cable television transmission, and interactive communications services, namely receipt, transmission and broadcasting of data, sound, text, images, video, video-on-demandSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 5, 2003C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Aug 5, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 14, 2003CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2002PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 9, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 15, 1997CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 7, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 1997SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 25, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 26, 1996IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 23, 1996IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Aug 23, 1996IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 23, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 30, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 13, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance