Drawing for THE ESSENTIAL NETWORK

USPTO serial 74587596

THE ESSENTIAL NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIRMAN, DONNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE ESSENTIAL NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Fowler

MARK A FOWLER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE230 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications, cable television transmission, and interactive communications services, namely receipt, transmission and broadcasting of data, sound, text, images, video, video-on-demand, audio and video teleconferencing by means of telephones, audio and video teleconferencing by means of telephones, cable networks, satellites, computer terminals, modems, and other technologies that enable communicationABANDONED—
041distribution of entertainment, educational, personal and other television cable casting to interactive multimedia systems including video on demand transmission services featuring movies, sports, cultural and other events, video and audio teleconferencing and telephone telecommunication servicesABANDONED—
042providing multiple-user access to a global network the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information and enabling access to additional entertainment, education and personal service capabilitiesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 17, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 1998EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 14, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 1997EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 16, 1997EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 10, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 23, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 7, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 8, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance