USPTO serial 74588308
ONE TO ONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ONE TO ONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
WALNUT CREEK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary M. Hamaker
MARY M HAMAKER AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS2999 OAK RD MS 800WALNUT CREEK, CA 94596UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | wireless voice and wireless data telecommunications services, namely cellular and personal communications phone and paging services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA
- Other trademarks owned by AIRTOUCH COMMUNICATIONS
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ONE TO ONE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 11, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 30, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |