USPTO serial 74588904
G NOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G NOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Gray
JOHN L GRAY EMENS, KEGLER, BROWN, HILL & RITTER65 E STATE ST STE 1800COLUMBUS, OH 43215UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |