USPTO serial 74590807
Q-AUTOCARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANCINI, CYNTHIA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Q-AUTOCARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dunn Loring, VA
Dunn Loring, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael E. Whitham
MICHAEL E WHITHAM WHITHAM, CURTIS, WHITAM & MCGINN11800 SUNRISE VALLLEY DRSTE 900RESTON, VA 22091Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microprocessor and integrated circuit chip containing cards which record the life history of new or used vehicles, namely manufacturer's information, especially vehicle identification, make and model identification, performance and mechanical specifications, and purchase details; ownership information, especially registrations, and change in ownership information; repair and maintenance information, especially place, date, and time information for repairs and maintenance, and identification of the type and cost of service and repair; accident information, especially description of the type of accident and place, date, and time of repair; and vehicle safety and emission information, especially safety and emission performance parameters, and place, date, time, and type of safety and emissions inspections | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |