USPTO serial 74590966
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2255792Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 1999
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westport, CT
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FAIRFIELD, CT
Westport, CT
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FAIRFIELD, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RACHEL BRENDZEL
RACHEL BRENDZEL LIEBERMAN & NOWAK LLP805 3RD AVE 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | technical consulting and research in the field of inventions, namely, invention assessment, analysis, licensing, research and development for new products for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by University Patents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by University Patents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |